<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Has anyone seen my spork?</title>
	<link>http://www.andrewbowman.com</link>
	<description>Times flies like an arrow.  Fruit flies like a banana.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:52:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>WSJ Asks the Right Question</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Rigging a Climate &#8216;Consensus&#8217;: About those emails and &#8216;peer review.&#8217;
I&#8217;m not going to quote from this one.  Read the whole thing.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.andrewbowman.com/2009/11/28/wsj-asks-the-right-question/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Appropriate Quote</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the &#8220;consensus science&#8221; we&#8217;re seeing in climate research:

“In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.”
&#8211;Galileo Galilei

]]></description>
		<link>http://www.andrewbowman.com/2009/11/27/appropriate-quote/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>WSJ Weighs in</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Global Warming With the Lid Off: The emails that reveal an effort to hide the truth about climate science.
That&#8217;s a damning headline If I&#8217;ve ever read one.  Below are selected quotes.
On collaboration (in the negative sense):

Yet even a partial review of the emails is highly illuminating. In them, scientists appear to urge each other [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.andrewbowman.com/2009/11/26/wsj-weighs-in/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bad Data Plus Bad Model Equals THE TRUTH?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[This is one of many articles on the recent leak of emails and computer modeling code from an important center for climate analysis and global warming research:
Congress May Probe Leaked Global Warming E-Mails [edit: added link]
I see three scenarios here:
The first is that the model and data are bad because there is no inconsistent discipline [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.andrewbowman.com/2009/11/25/bad-data-plus-bad-model-equals-the-truth/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Norman Borlaug, Nobel Prize winner, dead at 95</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a good article/obituary about Norman Borlaug.
From the article:

The day the award was announced, Dr. Borlaug, vigorous and slender at 56, was working in a wheat field outside Mexico City when his wife, Margaret, drove up to tell him the news. “Someone’s pulling your leg,” he replied, according to one of his biographers, Leon Hesser. [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.andrewbowman.com/2009/09/13/norman-borlaug-nobel-prize-winner-dead-at-95-years-ol/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Sorry Folks&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been distracted by Facebook (and Twitter) lately.  I&#8217;ve been ignoring my blog.  I need to get back in the saddle.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.andrewbowman.com/2009/09/12/sorry-folks/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>This would be cool for an office</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of places for books&#8230;
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.andrewbowman.com/2009/04/28/this-would-be-cool-for-an-office/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Remembering Michael Hedges</title>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been over a decade since Michael Hedges was killed in a automobile accident.  I&#8217;m still sad that he&#8217;s gone.

]]></description>
		<link>http://www.andrewbowman.com/2009/04/19/remembering-michael-hedges/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Icy Hot</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The common wisdom is that the ice at the poles is retreating faster than an Iraqi armored division.  Yet strangely enough, maybe it&#8217;s not.
Antarctic ice is growing, not melting away
Put that in your computer model and process it.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.andrewbowman.com/2009/04/19/icy-hot/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Heresy is Hot</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve written a few times before about what I see as irresponsible science&#8211;consensus science&#8211;around global warming.  I think the backlash against global warming is&#8230;er&#8230;warming up.
Here&#8217;s a post from Slashdot about Freman Dyson opposing the &#8220;lousy science&#8221; behind much of what is being promulgated today.
The Slashdot article links to a ]]></description>
		<link>http://www.andrewbowman.com/2009/03/28/heresy-is-hot/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
